Archive for the ‘change’ Category

Multitasking = Screw Ups

Monday, August 16th, 2010

from Jan Schwartz

2591454436_2d316a1820_mBefore I got on a conference call this morning I was deep into working on a webinar. The call, as usual, started with some chatting as we were waiting for everyone to join. I decided to keep working on the Keynote (PowerPoint to you non-Mac users) until we REALLY got started. So of course the Keynote was up on my screen, as were about 5 other documents and websites, along with Skype.

This is called multitasking by the masses. I’m either the only person among the masses who can’t multitask or those who say they multitask are blowing smoke.  I’m not saying you CAN’T do more than one thing at a time, I’m saying I don’t know how people can do more than one thing WELL at a time.

I missed when the real meeting started to take place, but it was somewhere between the iStock photo website and my script when I heard my name. “I guess Jan must have lost the call.” Whoops! I quickly saved what I was doing and minimized all my screens. Then I said, “Hey, I’m back, sorry about that!”

How many times has this happened to you? I learned some time ago that I couldn’t do more than one thing well at a time, especially on the computer. This morning was unusual for me–I generally do put aside what I am doing so I can pay attention to what is happening on the conference call. I read Brain Rules by John Medina and that is what made me give up even trying to multitask. I will say that before I read this book, I thought that I should be learning to multitask, because everyone was doing it. I’ve since changed my mind, at least about doing multiple tasks that require attention. I can still walk, talk and chew gum all at the same time.1034031447_edea115848_m

Here is what Medina says,

To put it bluntly, research shows that we can’t multitask. We are biologically incapable of processing attention-rich inputs simultaneously.

He then goes on to give some examples of what the research shows.  I’ll leave it to you to read the book.

My own example: I can’t tell you how many times I missed a turn because I was talking to someone while driving–even the person sitting next to me.  Both tasks required paying attention.

Medina is not saying we can’t walk, talk and chew gum at the same time, but that we can’t pay attention to multiple cognitive tasks at the same time and do any one of them justice.

So what do you think people mean when they say they multitask and how do you think it affects how we learn, online and otherwise?

Photo credits: Flickr, CarbonNYC and Flickr, Mike Licht

The “upside” of teaching ethics online

Wednesday, July 14th, 2010

From Judith McDanieldifferent directions

     One of the things I really like about ethics—teaching ethics, I mean—is that we can find some timeless ethical principles that have always been with us.  These principles cross country boundaries and political systems and millennial markers.  No matter what the specific cultural beliefs of a country, a community that survives from one generation to the next does so because it adheres to one or several of these timeless ethical principles.
     The second thing I really like about teaching ethics is how quickly the situations in which we need to apply those principles change.  This combination makes teaching ethics online a perfect combination.  Let me explain–
     What are those timeless principles? 
           1.  Ethical decisions based on the greatest good.  This system of thought assumes a community whose members are joined in a shared pursuit of common goals.  The community is made up of individuals who have defined their individual good as inextricably tied into achieving the good of the whole.  The principle of this system would state:  What is ethical is what advances the common good.
          2.  Ethical decisions based on fundamental rights.  Human rights, civil rights—these are issues that have been in the news and in our daily discussion for more than sixty years.  This approach to an ethical system maintains that each person has a fundamental right to be respected and treated as a free and equal rational person capable of making his or her own decision. 
          3.  Ethical decisions based on fairness.  Definitions of ethical conduct in this system are based on how fairly or unfairly our actions benefit or burden others.  One guideline here is consistency in the way people are treated; however, consistency by itself does not ensure fairness.  There are justifiable reasons for treating people differently based on need, effort, merit, fault, disability. The principle of this system would state:  Treat people the same unless there are relevant differences between them. 
     What changes?  The context in which these principles are being applied changes every day and with every group or culture.  I am not talking about “situational ethics” but rather about the things you do that require you to apply these standards, whether you think about them consciously or not. 
     My course materials on the ethical principles never have to change; but the online format allows me to make instant changes in the discussions and problem-solving that students are doing—and I can change the scenario in a day or an hour, whatever the student/participant group needs.