Multitasking = Screw Ups

August 16th, 2010

from Jan Schwartz

2591454436_2d316a1820_mBefore I got on a conference call this morning I was deep into working on a webinar. The call, as usual, started with some chatting as we were waiting for everyone to join. I decided to keep working on the Keynote (PowerPoint to you non-Mac users) until we REALLY got started. So of course the Keynote was up on my screen, as were about 5 other documents and websites, along with Skype.

This is called multitasking by the masses. I’m either the only person among the masses who can’t multitask or those who say they multitask are blowing smoke.  I’m not saying you CAN’T do more than one thing at a time, I’m saying I don’t know how people can do more than one thing WELL at a time.

I missed when the real meeting started to take place, but it was somewhere between the iStock photo website and my script when I heard my name. “I guess Jan must have lost the call.” Whoops! I quickly saved what I was doing and minimized all my screens. Then I said, “Hey, I’m back, sorry about that!”

How many times has this happened to you? I learned some time ago that I couldn’t do more than one thing well at a time, especially on the computer. This morning was unusual for me–I generally do put aside what I am doing so I can pay attention to what is happening on the conference call. I read Brain Rules by John Medina and that is what made me give up even trying to multitask. I will say that before I read this book, I thought that I should be learning to multitask, because everyone was doing it. I’ve since changed my mind, at least about doing multiple tasks that require attention. I can still walk, talk and chew gum all at the same time.1034031447_edea115848_m

Here is what Medina says,

To put it bluntly, research shows that we can’t multitask. We are biologically incapable of processing attention-rich inputs simultaneously.

He then goes on to give some examples of what the research shows.  I’ll leave it to you to read the book.

My own example: I can’t tell you how many times I missed a turn because I was talking to someone while driving–even the person sitting next to me.  Both tasks required paying attention.

Medina is not saying we can’t walk, talk and chew gum at the same time, but that we can’t pay attention to multiple cognitive tasks at the same time and do any one of them justice.

So what do you think people mean when they say they multitask and how do you think it affects how we learn, online and otherwise?

Photo credits: Flickr, CarbonNYC and Flickr, Mike Licht

Consider the source

August 12th, 2010

From Judith McDaniel

Consider the source.  Does it matter?

Sources 2

Well, yes, my mother always told me it did.  What DID she mean by that?  My friend who was always in need of a face-wash was probably not the best source for information on hygiene?  LOL, as my Facebook friends say.  

But why is it important to say that the great idea we are writing about started with someone else?  Why not take credit myself?  After all, when I have put my spin on it, I’m as much the owner of the idea as the source.  And didn’t I say last week that you can copyright words, but not ideas?  Yes, but here’s why source attribution matters—even for ideas.

1.  If I got a great idea from a source, maybe someone else will too. It won’t hurt me to give someone else credit. Share the wealth, share the source. 

2.  I’ve evaluated the source and decided it is worth using. My evaluation may be sound.  I may believe the academic credentials of the author are credible.  If I share the source, I am demonstrating that I believe in it.  If I hide the source, what am I demonstrating? 

3.  I thought about this issue last week when Shirley Sherrod was fired from her job on the basis of a clip from a speech she gave to the NAACP.  The video clip was taken out of context and spliced to make her words appear to mean exactly the opposite of what she actually said.  Those who reacted to the clip did not ask, what was the source of this information?  If they had, they might have discovered that the blogger who posted it had been discredited for misinformation and for falsified videos on more than one occasion. Fox News and CNN originally ran the story without attributing the source, reporting the misinformation in a way that made it impossible to check. 

I’ve heard the internet compared to the wild west of folklore—every person for him/herself.  I don’t think the west was ever really like that and it is not the internet I want to help grow.  Sharing our sources is one way to keep the information flow reliable and discoverable.

Page 3 of 54«12345»...Last »